A Conservative Mandate At LastEnee Meenee Minee Mo...Catch A Liberal By Their Toe...
LiberalsAreAlwaysWhining
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit LiberalsAreAlwaysWhining's Xanga Site!

Name: Rick
Birthday: 2/25/1951
Gender: Male


Interests: Making Liberals Whine, Koi and Pond Fish, Exotic Birds, Politics, U.S. History, Fox News Watcher (Don't you just hate me!) Breaking my CDs of Mellencamp, Springstein and Bon Jovie, I pay to hear their music, NOT their political views.
Expertise: Blue Collar Worker Turned Small Business Owner. Master Mason, Knight Templer. Red Cross Volenteer, Bulk Distribution and Logistics.
Occupation: Customer service/support
Industry: Business


Message: message meEmail: email me
Website: visit my website


Member Since: 11/5/2004

SubscriptionsSites I Read
Nadine_Charmichael
sends
ProudAmerican912
TheUnstained
MyNameIsHippo
astralsouldivine

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Friday, November 17, 2006

What does Freemasonry Offer the World?

What does Freemasonry
Offer the World?

From the Short talk Bulletin Vol. XLIII August, 1965,
published by the Masonic Service Association of the
United States, Washington. D.C
.
Originally a talk given on the 100th Anniversary of Burns Lodge #173, Monticello, Iowa June 15, 1965 by Alphonse Cerza Riverside Lodge #862, Riverside Illinois. P.M. Waubansia Lodge #160, Chicago, Illinois member Illinois Grand Lodge Committee on Masonic Information, F.P.S
.

While Freemasonry in its present form has existed less than 300 years, there have always been associations resembling this great Fraternity. Such groups were formed at various times and in many places because man is fundamentally a social creature; he has an inherent need for friendship, love, and association with others.

What is Freemasonry? A brief definition is: an organization of men believing in the Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man, using the builder's tools as symbols to teach basic moral truths, thereby impressing upon the minds of its members the cardinal virtues of Brotherly Love, Relief, and Truth which they should apply to everyday activities.

If this description seems out of place in the cynical world of today, let us remember that "Man does not live by bread alone." There is a real need for what is derisively called "the old-fashioned virtues."

Last summer Rosco Pound, one of the great men of this country, laid down the working tools of life after ninety-four years of distinguished labor on this earth. Many years ago he made a significant observation: "Masonry has more to offer the twentieth century than the twentieth century has to offer Masonry."

Why did he make this statement?

At the dawn of history man was confronted with many problems: hunger, the elements, disease, and other dangers. But God gave him memory so that he could profit from his experiences; later came the gift of communication which enabled him to pass on his experiences from generation to generation. Over the intervening centuries we have increased our means of producing food, conquered many diseases, and solved most of the problems concerning the practical things of life. Yet with all this progress in technological skills man has not kept up his moral advancement. In spite of all the comforts afforded us in this modern world, we do not find happiness, peace, and tranquility.

As we look around us today, what do we find? Frustrated individuals, unhappy people, everyone demanding more "rights", everyone seeking more "security", a desire for more gadgets, an increase in community problems and undeclared wars in many places. Everyone thinks "BIG" about the production of things, accomplishing a program, or handling community matters.

What can we learn from Freemasonry which will help the modern world?

First, Freemasonry is not a "mass medium". It works with and through the individual member. We do not have group initiations; each member is taken alone and taught the lessons of a good life. Each new member is prepared as an individual; he is the one important person who is initiated, then passed to the higher grades as he acquires proficiency in the tasks at hand. Certain members spend time with him alone so that he may learn the lessons exemplified by the degrees.

In Freemasonry the individual is all important. We consider the individual member the most important thing in the world. Bear in mind that in every community we have plural persons; you cannot have a happy community unless the individuals who form that community are individually happy. Under our form of government the individual is glorified; he is part of the nation's governing body. Unlike other political ideologies which preach that the person is merely a means of serving the government, we as Americans and as Masons say that the government exists to serve the people.

Freemasonry offers to the world today the basic ideal that is being slowly forgotten: that each individual is important and that his personal welfare counts.

Second, Freemasonry is among the agencies which offer the world the principle of the Fatherhood of God. In too many places God is the forgotten element. Many of the prevailing "isms" cast aside the idea of God as old-fashioned, superstitious, an opiate. Freemasonry has God as its sole foundation stone.

Freemasonry does not concern itself with the dogmas, forms of worship, or the theology of any church. A Mason must profess a belief in God and immortality; but Freemasonry does not teach him how God manifests himself to man or how man is reconciled with God. It is true that Freemasonry tries to enrich a member's belief in God by instructing him in the moral law and the hidden secrets of nature and science. It tries to do that for every member.

Freemasonry therefore offers a tolerance for the religious beliefs of all men, to the point that they can meet and pray together in complete harmony. There is only one God, no matter what name we give Him. Freemasonry has for centuries afforded men of all creeds a chance to meet together and to understand each other's belief in the Fatherhood of God. It is the only world-wide organization where there is no political or religious discussion permitted.

Third, Freemasonry also offers the world the principle that follows logically from what has just been said, "The Brotherhood of Man". If we have a common Father, are we all not brothers? Today we hear too little about this ideal.

At every turn we hear of demands for "rights" of one kind or another. How often do we hear of duties or obligations? Freemasonry teaches the duties we owe to others; it teaches obligations that its members owe their families, their communities, and their country. With every "right" there is a corresponding duty or obligation. The world today is emphasizing its demands for "rights", but is conveniently forgetting its corresponding duties. Freemasonry says nothing about "rights", but has much to say about the duties and obligations that each member owes. If all of us do our duty, all will profit; and there is no need to discuss "rights' where men do their duty, because justice will prevail.

Fourth, Freemasonry evolved from the builder's guilds of the Middle Ages, and therefore the word "work" plays an important part in our philosophy and our ceremonies.

Today, there seems to be too much desire to get something for nothing. We have trading stamps, quiz programs, horse races, and other gambling activities catering to this desire.

Wealth is the result of working with natural resources and creating something useful. Wealth is not something which comes from the government. This may sound like a modern heresy to many of you. All the government does is collect its money from the taxpayers and then distribute it; and the handling charge is enormous!

Our immediate ancestors, the operative masons, were workers with their hands. They built structures of wood and stone. The had an apprentice system to teach young men to work and develop their natural skills. The idea of" work" is woven into the very fabric of Freemasonry. The world today needs to be taught all over again that work is honorable, that work is necessary, and that work makes for happiness.

Freemasonry takes this idea of work from the operative Masons and converts it into a symbol. No longer do Freemasons build structures that are visible, but we build a symbolic structure of character, that house not built with hands, eternal in the heavens.

Our Federal Constitution assures us that we are entitled to the pursuit of happiness. Too many people overlook the word "pursuit" and place the stress on the word "happiness." This great charter of government does not guarantee happiness; that is an individual matter. It merely guarantees the "pursuit"; or to put it in a different way, it offers opportunity to use your God-given skills so that you can work with them and secure happiness. This also is the aim of Freemasonry.

Fifth, Freemasonry offers the world an opportunity for social contacts and the development of friendships.

The feeling of "belonging" is a vital part of every man's being. No one can be an island unto himself. To be happy, we must belong to a family, a community, a country club, or a large number of associations.

Freemasonry is the best group for this purpose because of its glorious past, the great men who have been Masons, the lessons it teaches to its members, and the opportunity it affords to the service of Mankind. The constant bringing together of its members in worthwhile activities helps to promote this feeling of "belonging".

Related to this element is what psychologists call the feeling of importance. In order to be happy each person must feel "important" to someone to something. Freemasonry affords many opportunities for the development of this feeling, not only from the pride of belonging to the greatest fraternal organization in the world, but also from the many, many opportunities to serve as officers, to do charitable work, to visit sick members, etc., all of which gives the member a sense of being important to his fellow members and the organization. Here again we are stressing the importance of the individual rather than the group.

This is one of the intangible, subtle, but necessary elements of Freemasonry in making individuals happy. As it has already been observed, if the individual is happy, the community is happy. If communities are happy, the nation is happy; and if nations are happy, the world will be at peace.

Sixth, Freemasonry offers the world the philosophy of life. The Masonic degrees are designed to teach each member certain basic moral truths. No man ever became a Mason without becoming a better Man. The lessons are taught in a unique manner which makes the principles more effective.

Sometimes we are presented with a pertinent question: if the lessons of Freemasonry are so beneficial, why are they taught behind closed doors? The answer lies in the nature of man himself. That which is open to constant view becomes commonplace and attracts no attention. That which is hidden is sought, is searched for, is attractive and creates interest. The idea is illustrated by the detective story; who dunnit?

Added to this is the fact that all the lessons are taught with symbols. This is an effective teaching method; it causes the student to learn more easily. A moral lesson can be told in a few effective words describing a symbol. With the use of the builder's tools Freemasonry teaches moral lessons. Many Masonic expressions have found their way into everyday conversation. We use the square to illustrate honesty in our dealings with one another: "He's on the square," or "He is a square dealer." Teenagers have a different conception of the word "square" today, but that is a passing phase.

Each candidate for the degrees receives this philosophy of life in a most impressive manner. Suffice it to say here that this Way of Life contains all the lessons or rules adopted by all good men. It covers the Golden Rule. It teaches us that we are our Brother's keeper. It teaches that we can best worship God by rendering service to our fellowmen. We are taught tolerance in all things. We are taught that honesty is the only policy.

It is true that these moral lessons are taught in the schools and in the churches, but the method of teaching used in a Masonic lodge is unique. Furthermore, these lessons can be taught without reference to sectarian creeds or dogmas. Masonic teaching is not restricted by practical considerations such as exist in a political organization. Freedom of thought and expression can be taught and practiced without any reference to the results of the next election. Freemasonry has blended together many of the characteristics of churches, schools, social clubs, and ethical societies; but while resemblances with such organizations can be noted, none is exactly like the great organization the world knows as Freemasonry.

To summarize all this in just a few words, let us answer the question in the title as briefly as possible. Freemasonry offers to mankind an emphasis on the importance of the individual, the belief in the brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God, the concept of the dignity of work and its necessity for the pursuit of happiness, the opportunity to realize one's social aspirations in a morally constructive way, and a philosophy of life which can lead to individual, and therefore community happiness. And the twentieth century really needs what Freemasonry offers.

  
 


Thursday, November 16, 2006

The new Masons, an Article by the Boston Globle

 

The new Masons

The centuries-old fraternity, in an effort to remain relevant, is shedding its secrecy in order to attract young members

With his mop of black hair, silver nose ring and double-pierced ear, Nikki Stone, a 31-year-old rock guitarist, looked a bit out of place last weekend as he stood surrounded by serious-looking men in dark suits beneath baronial, 50-foot ceilings at the Masonic Lodge on Tremont Street in Boston.

But Stone, and the dozens of other non-Masons milling about, was a much sought after guest. With their aging membership at a 50-year-ebb and the vitality of their future in doubt, the Masons are trying something new in their august 275-year history: They have started recruiting.

``We're trying to bring the Masons into the 21st century," Jeffrey Hodgdon, grand master of the Masons in Massachusetts said at an open house in Lexington, the same day that Stone visited the Boston lodge. ``If we don't do something, we're going down the tubes."

From the 18th century through the 1990s, the Masons , surrounded by an aura of secrecy and prestige, did not recruit. They didn't need to -- new members came to them. But when the baby boomers started to snub the Masons en masse -- along with nearly every other fraternal organization -- membership dwindled. In Massachusetts, the number of Masons dropped from 130,441 in 1960 to 42,045 last year.

So, two years ago, the Masons nationwide broke with long standing tradition and went public.

In Massachusetts, the recruitment drive has been unique in scope and intensity, said Hodgdon, who has played a key role in the membership drive. The Massachusetts campaign has included open houses and a $800,000 radio and television sales pitch. The spots characterize the fraternity as a cornerstone of civility and heritage in an increasingly uncivil and unstable world.

The result: So far, so good.

``There's definitely a mystique here," said Stone. ``As a guy with a rock 'n' roll back ground, it seems cooler than the Knights of Columbus."

In the past two years, about 3,000 men have joined the Masons in Massachusetts, said Hodgdon, of Lexington, who attended four of the 240 open houses held across the state Oct. 7. It is the most interest shown in the organization in decades. And, at a time when most of the members are in their 50s and 60s, 62 percent of the new members are between 18 and 39, said Robert Huke, a spokesman for the Grand Lodge of Masons in Massachusetts.

At the Harvard University lodge in Cambridge, membership has jumped from 125 to about 320 in two years. The average age of new members there is 22.5.

``There's a connection that's being made," said Ryan Johnson, the 31-year-old master of the Harvard lodge. ``People are saying, `You know that organization has been around for a long time. There must be something to it.' "

Masons and sociologists attribute the resurgence to a confluence of factors. Exposure, for starters. But also timing. Fraternal organizations have traditionally expanded during times of war and their immediate aftermath when veterans, used to the camaraderie of other men, look for organizations to bring them together.

There may also be a generational shift at play. For a group raised in cyberspace in an increasingly atomized society, a hunger for connectedness has begun driving younger people back toward fraternities. Especially in the post 9/11 world.

Indeed, the Masons are aiming their sales pitch at young people who came of age around the time of the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. A group now between 18 and 27.

``September 11 was a real shaking point," said Johnson, who lives in New York and flies to Boston for monthly meetings. ``That event killed the `me generation' and you had this feeling that you need your friends, you need your family, you need your community, you couldn't do it all alone."

The Massachusetts strategy to recruit originated with Hodgdon, who owns a GM dealership in Arlington and has a keen appreciation for marketing. He organized the effort around the GM sales model. He standardized open houses around the state, had 10,000 askafreemason.org rubber bracelets made, and brought on the Boston Light marketing firm to come up with a pitch.

Last summer, the firm interviewed hundreds of men, ages 21 to 40, in bars across Boston. Among the questions they asked: ``Is there greatness in you?" said Robert Heruska, a partner and the firms creative director.

``We thought maybe half the people we spoke to would say yes, but it was about 99 percent," Heruska said. ``The question really hit a nerve."

The line became the campaign's tag. The commercial presents a Benjamin Franklin impersonator whose voice sounds dipped in earnestness and wisdom.

The pitch plays on the fraternity's long history, stability, and ability to ``make good men great." Franklin's summation: ``Free masonry has been preparing great men since our country's founding."

The Masons evolved in England in the early 18th century from a guild of builders. The first lodge was chartered in America in Boston in 1733 and became closely associated with the ideals of Enlightenment and then the American Revolution through men like George Washington, Paul Revere, and Franklin.

Between 1870 and 1920 -- when 300 fraternal organizations were started in the United States -- the Masons' popularity soared, dipped during the Great Depression, then grew again after World War II, eventually hitting a high point in 1963 with more than 4 million members, said historian Steven C. Bullock, a professor of history at Worcester Polytechnic Institute and the author of ``Revolutionary Brotherhood," that examines the historical significance of the group.

The decline among the Masons parallels the drop in most service clubs and civic organizations. In Robert Putnam's 2000 book ``Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community," he writes that the number of Americans attending club meetings has fallen off by 58 percent in a generation. Two-parent working families and a wider array of ways to spend free time fueled the decline.

Indeed, by 2005, membership in the Masons nationwide had fallen from more than 4 million in 1963 to about 1.6 million and the average age had climbed to 62, said Bullock.

To reverse the trend, the Masons lowered the age of membership from 21 to 18 and began to dip into the realm of recruitment.

``More than anything this is an awareness campaign," said Huke. ``Our standards remain the same."

Johnson, whose great-grandfather was a Mason, answered an ad in a college newspaper to join the group when he was in graduate school and began to ask his friends.

Word spread quickly. Meetings that used to attract eight or 10 Masons to the Harvard lodge now regularly pull in 150, Johnson said. The sense that the Masons offer a principled cornerstone in an age of slipping standards hit a nerve.

``We never had to endure hunger or a Great Depression or disease or anything like that so we're comfortable with life materially," said Robert Bolcone, of Gloucester, a 23-year-old student at Harvard Medical School who joined last year. ``I think my generation is searching for something more, something greater,"

Harvard-affiliated Masons like Bolcone said they appreciated the formality of the ritual in an age when the rest of their lives is so informal. The lodge is one of the few places where young men can actively seek out older mentors. And the teachings, through centuries old parables and metaphors, resonate.

Tom Sander, a professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government who studies civic engagement, said the uptick fits a larger pattern. Twenty-somethings who came of age around the time of the Sept. 11 attacks are searching for something larger than themselves.

``They see their fate as intertwined with the fate of others in a way the generation before them did not," he said. ``The generation before them believed that if you earned enough money you could insulate yourself from the fears of society. . . . This generation is much more likely to seek out community."

Stone, the rock 'n' roller, offered a less idealistic reason for joining, as old as any other. This fall he hopes to open a bar in Malden. ``It never hurts to network," he said. ``It could be good for business."

Douglas Belkin can be reached at dbelkin@globe.com  


Wednesday, November 15, 2006

How Long Do We Have?

Sent to me by a friend;

Read and Think....??
                 How Long Do We Have?

    About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new
constitutionin 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the
University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the                                                                            Athenian Republic some2,000 years earlier:

 "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist                                                                    as a permanent form of government.  A democracy will continue to exist up
until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves  generous
gifts from the public treasury.  From that moment on, the majority
always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public
treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due
to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."

 "The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginnin of history,                                             has been about 200 years.  During those 200 years, those
nations always progressed through the following sequence:

     1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
     2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
     3. From courage to liberty;
     4. From liberty to abundance;
     5. From abundance to complacency;
     6. From complacency to apathy;
     7. From apathy to dependence;
     8. From dependence back into bondage"

    Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul,
    Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the
    2000 Presidential election:

     Population of counties won by: Gore: 127 million; Bush: 143 million
     Square miles of land won by: Gore: 580,000; Bush: 2,427,000
     States won by: Gore: 19; Bush: 29
     Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Gore: 13.2;
     Bush: 2.1

    Professor Olson adds:  "In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won
    was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of this great country.
    Gore's territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in
    government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
    welfare..."

    Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the
    "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of
   democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having
    reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

    If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
    invaders called illegals and they vote, then goodbye to the USA in
    fewer than five years.

    Pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake,
    knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.


   


Saturday, August 05, 2006

Muslims, terrorist and the USA. A different spin on Iraq war.

This WAR is for REAL!

Dr. Vernon Chong, Major General, USAF, Retired

Tuesday, July 12, 2005 To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go

through it. Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its

existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).

The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there

are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even

fewer who realize what losing really means.

First, let's examine a few basic:

1. When did the threat to us start? Many will say September 11, 2001.

The answer as far as the United State is concerned is 1979, 22 years

prior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:

* Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;

* Beirut, Lebanon Embassy 1983;

* Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;

* Lockerbie, Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;

* First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;

* Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;

* Nairobi, Kenya US Embassy 1998;

* Dares Salaam, Tanzania US Embassy 1998;

* Aden, Yemen USS Cole 2000;

* New York World Trade Center 2001;

* Pentagon 2001.

(Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).

2. Why were we attacked?

Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks

happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush

1, Clinton and Bush 2. We cannot fault either the Republicans or

Democrats as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or

their immediate predecessors, Presidents Ford or Carter.

3. Who were the attackers?

In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.

4. What is the Muslim population of the World?

25%.

5. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?

Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the

predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under

the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that

made no difference. You either went along with the administration or

you were eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by

the Nazis for political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests).

(see http://www.nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm )

 

Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as

the six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom

heard of anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept

the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone

who got in his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world -

German, Christian or any others.

Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US, but kill

all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, French or anyone else.

The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no

protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims

there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim

leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own

pronouncements -- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peaceful

Muslims. What would you do if the >choice was shut up or die?

6. So who are we at war with?

There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the

Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing

this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you don't

clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.

So with that background, now to the two major questions:

1. Can we lose this war?

2. What does losing really mean?

If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions

We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the

major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the

answer to the second question - What does losing mean?

It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means

hanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our

business, like post Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get.

 

What losing really means is:

 

We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks will

not subside, but rather will steadily increase. Remember, they want us

dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not

have produced >an increasing series of attacks against us, over the past

18 years. The plan was clearly, for terrorist to attack us, until we were

neutered and submissive to them.

 

We would of course have no future support from other nations, for fear of

reprisals and for the reason that they would see, we are impotent and

cannot help them.

 

They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It will be

increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. It doesn't

matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from

Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and

told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do will

be done. Spain is finished.

 

The next will probably be France. Our one hope on France is that they

might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished

too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However,

it may already be too late for France. France is already 20% Muslim and

fading fast!

 

If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life will

all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us,

if they were threatened by the Muslims. If we can't stop the Muslims, how

could anyone else?

 

The Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are

completely committed to winning, at any cost. We better know it too and be

likewise committed to winning at any cost.

 

Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until

we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of

our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100%

effort to win.

 

So, how can we lose the war?

 

Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by "imploding." That is,

defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose,

and really digging in and lending full support to the war effort If we are

united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be divided,

there is no way that we can win!

 

Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the life

and death seriousness of this situation.

 

President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.

Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between

17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. Does

that sound like we are taking this thing seriously? This is war! For the

duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights we have

become accustomed to. We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil

rights temporarily or  we will most certainly lose all of them

permanently.

 

And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil

rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory and in

fact added many more since then.

 

Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?

 

No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political

Correctness, and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a

clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get them

out of your head.

 

Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the

Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us

lose. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are disloyal. It is

because  they just don't recognize what losing means. Nevertheless, that

conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and

weakening. It concerns our friends, and it does great damage to our cause.

 

Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media

regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies best

what I am saying. We have recently had an issue, involving the treatment

of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police.

These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their

own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their

tongues and otherwise murdering their own people just for disagreeing with

Saddam Hussein.

 

And just a few years ago these same type prisoners chemically killed

400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are also the same

type of enemy fighters, who recently were burning Americans, and dragging

their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq.

 

And still more recently, the same type of enemy that was and is providing

videos to all news sources internationally, of the beheading of American

prisoners they held.

 

Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days

have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of some

Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses

through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.

 

Can this be for real?

 

The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the

Secretary of Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of

comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are

fighting, the life and death struggle we are in and the disastrous results

of losing this war, nothing can.

 

To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner

issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally

oblivious to what is going on in the real world. Neither we, nor any other

country, can survive this internal strife. Again I say, this does not mean

that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal. It simply means

that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude, of the situation we

are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us, for many

years.

 

Remember, the Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels! That

translates into ALL non-Muslims -- not just in the United State, but

throughout the world.

 

We are the last bastion of defense.

 

We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant.' That charge is

valid in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we believe that we

are so good, powerful and smart, that we can win the hearts and minds of

all those who attack us, and that with both hands tied behind our back, we

can defeat anything bad in the world!

 

We can't!

 

If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not survive, and

no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.

 

And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow

freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the

press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any

status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that

contributes to the good of the world.

 

This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war or

we will be equated in the history books to the self-inflicted fall of the

Roman Empire . If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to

be written or read.

 

If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims

take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue to

increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach little

by little, on the established French traditions. The French will be

fighting among themselves, over what should or should not be done, which

will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve.

Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?

 

Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some

external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away,

politically correct piece by politically correct piece.

 

And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide

that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to

themselves, once they are in power.

 

They have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then

start brutally killing each other over who will be the few who control the

masses. Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct, about the

"peaceful Muslims"?

 

I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above. If we are

united, there is no way that we can lose. I hope now after the election,

the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation

we are in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are

talking about! Do whatever you can to preserve it.

 

After reading the above, we all must do this not only for ourselves, but

our children, our grandchildren, our country and the world

 

Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal and that include

the Politicians and media of our country and the free world!

 

Please forward this to any you feel may want, or NEED to read it. Our

"leaders" in Congress ought to read it, too. There are those that find

fault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks

through this, that we must UNITE!

 

If you would like to see who this fellow is go to this Air Force web sight

and look him up. http://www.af.mil/bios/alpha.asp?alpha=C


Sunday, June 04, 2006

THE PROMISED LAND

5,000 years ago Moses said, "Pick up your shovel,  pack your ass,  mount
your camel and  I'll lead you to the promised land."


200-plus years ago George Washington said, "Get off your ass,  use your
shovel,  clear the land,  grow tobacco for camels and it will become  the
promised land.

Last week the Congress of the United States said: "Si, Amigos,  throw
away your shovels,  sit on your ass,  light your camels,  we're giving you the
Promised Land."



Next 5 >>

<bgsound src="http://www.blindray.com/music/02Montessori.mp3" loop="infinite">